Pages

If there were no God, there would be no Atheists.
-G.K. Chesterson

Friday, September 11, 2015

From the Jesus Blog

Here is the whole post, penned by Anthony Le Donne, from the Jesus Blog.

Jesus is a Socialist Loser

The gospel according to Donald Trump is pretty clear: the world is full of lots of losers and a few winners and the the winners deserve the glory. This is not a quotation from Trump. This is not a paraphrase. This is the persona that Trump has created for himself over the past 30 years of public life. This is the gist of what Trump is all about and I doubt he'd try to nuance my summary because nuance is for losers.

There has been a rumor circulating that Donald Trump called Jesus a "socialist loser." This too is not a quotation from Trump. He didn't say it and (now that America has hit rock bottom) now that he is a viable nominee for the GOP he won't say it. In America, nobody campaigns against Jesus.

But let's be clear: in Trump's America Jesus certainly looks like a socialist loser. If we're talking about the historical Jesus who disavows wealth and is crushed by Roman execution, Jesus is a loser. If we're talking about the Pauline Jesus who empties himself to the lowest possible status (cf. Phil 2), Jesus is a loser. If we're talking about Luke's Jesus who founds a community of common wealth, Jesus is a loser. The Jesus of John's Apocalypse is a "winner" of sorts, but still probably a bit too lambish within Trump's economy. Most importantly, Jesus in various ways and in various portraits identifies with the disenfranchised. Jesus clearly resides on the wrong side of Trump's wall.

-anthony

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

From Larry Hurtado's Blog: "Early Christianity on Sexual Abuse of Children"

This is a good, quick read on the history of perceptions of Christianity and sexual abuse of children. 

The sexual abuse of children has now become a major and publicly recognized concern (and high time too!).  A recent study by John W. Martens shows that for early Christians, too, it was a major concern, and that this is reflected in what appears to be a distinctive early Christian vocabulary to refer to the practice:  John W. Martens, “‘Do Not Sexually Abuse Children’: The Language of Early Christian Sexual Ethics,” in Children in Late Ancient Christianity, eds. Cornelia B. Horn and Robert R. Phenix (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009), 227-54.
As Martens notes, there was a whole Greek vocabulary for the practice of having sex with children:  “pederastia” (“child-love”), “pederastes” (“child-lover”), etc.  Indeed, Roman-era poets and others celebrate the practice, and it seems to have been tolerated widely.  It was particularly slave-children who likely suffered the most.  But (and this is Martens’ contribution) in early Christian texts we see what appears to be a rejection of these benign and condoning terms in favour of terms to express forthrightly that the practice is evil and destructive.
In Christian texts from the second century onward, the person who engages in sex with children is called a “paidophthoros” (“child-corrupter/abuser”), and there is the prohibition, “do not corrupt/abuse children” (“me paidophthoreseis“).  Our earliest instances are in Epistle of Barnabas (10:6; 19:4) and Didache (2:2).  These terms seem to have been coined by early Christians to re-label and condemn the practice and those who engage in it:  Not “child-love,” but “child-corruption.” https://larryhurtado.wordpress.com/2015/08/26/early-christianity-on-sexual-abuse-of-children/
Read this rest with the above link. 
-Steven C 


Thursday, June 18, 2015

From the Jesus Blog

This is from the Jesus Blog.

"Rick Perry cites Jesus' Profit-ic Libertarianism
Today I received (via FB) this word of wisdom from New Testament scholar and Fortress Press editor, Neil Elliott:
One man who would be president cites Mark 14 to dismiss concern for the poor (who "will always be with you"). That's not just insensitive and callous: it's bad Bible reading. Deuteronomy 15 was the likely background for Jesus' words: "SINCE there will never cease to be some poor and needy on the earth, I [GOD] therefore command you, 'Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.'" Better Fortress Press resources make the point -- Emerson B. Powery, for example, in TRUE TO OUR NATIVE LAND: AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN NEW TESTAMENT COMMENTARY (2007); Raquel Lettsome in FORTRESS COMMENTARY ON THE NEW TESTAMENT (2014); etc.
Thank you, Neil. " 

Thursday, April 16, 2015

A Great Post from Another Blog for my Ministerial Friends

From Meagre Powers: "

‘Why should I study Hebrew?’

I’m often asked by people going to theological college or seminary, “Why should I study Hebrew?’ Less often, they ask, “Why should I study Greek?”
They’re good questions. Vital questions.
To answer, I want you to imagine this scenario.
You’ve just arrived at university, bright-eyed and bushy-tailed. You’re there to study French literature. In fact, it’s been your dream for a few years now to study French literature. You love French culture. You’ve travelled to Paris and fallen in love with the place. You adore French cuisine. Now you want to sink your teeth into the masterpieces that French authors have produced. So you’ve enrolled in the course, bought all the books, and checked your timetable. You’re ready to begin.
And so the day finally arrives. You find the classroom. You walk in, find a seat, and try to get comfortable. But you find yourself shuffling in your seat with nervous anticipation.
Then the Professor walks in.
Your excitement piques even more. At last, you’re actually fulfilling that long-held desire to immerse yourself in French literature.
Bonjour!’ says the Professor.
Bonjour!’ you respond, perhaps a little too enthusiastically.
The Professor proceeds to hand out a schedule for the semester. As you scan down the list, you see that each class is a feast of French classics: Alexandre Dumas, Victor Hugo, Jules Verne, Gaston Leroux, Paul Verlaine… C’est formidable!
The wide smile on your face grows even wider. This is going to be such a treat!
Once all the schedules have been handed out, the Professor gathers everyone’s attention. He clears his throat, and begins to address you all.
“Everybody,” he says, “I want you to know that I actually don’t know any French. I do know bonjour, of course, and how to say escargot properly,” he chuckles, “as well as a handful of other words I’ve picked up here and there. But I don’t actually know the language. Nevertheless, we’re going to have a great time together studying French literature.”
The smile that had beamed across your face now flees.
“This is the ‘Professor?'” you ask yourself. “How is he going to teach us French literature if he doesn’t even know French? He’s not an expert! How are we supposed to trust him if he can’t even read the French for himself? Is this what I signed up for?”
are-you-serious-wtf-meme-baby-face
The moral of the story?
If you’re going to be teaching people from a pulpit, interpreting the word of God for them, unpacking its meaning, its significance, and ensuring its positive impact on them, then do the responsible thing and learn the word of God in its original languages. Congregations will be looking to you as their expert who is not just willing but also able to read rightly and teach tightly the Scriptures. Do not sell them short!
For some reason seminary students often don’t need convincing about the value of learning Greek for New Testament study, and yet they do need substantial persuasion to learn Hebrew for the benefit of Old Testament study, not to mention Aramaic for the small portions of it in the Old Testament. 
A friend of mine who pastors a congregation told me of a young man in his church who was heading off to study at a theological college. This young man approached my friend for advice on making a choice: should he study Greek when he got to college, or should he study Hebrew? My friend’s response was legendary: “Well,” he said, “when you finish college and get up into your pulpit, do you want to be wearing only your shirt, or only your pants?”
It is incumbent on those who would be teachers to give their best efforts to the task, so as to honour the God whose Scriptures they are handling, as well as the congregations they are serving. Yes, we have the Bible translated into English and other languages, but there is always some loss in translation. If there weren’t, we might not ever need to hear another sermon again: we could just read our English translations all by ourselves, and never have to meet up regularly. But God has appointed some to be teachers in his Church as a means of blessing his Church with the full measure of the knowledge of the Son of God. This is why not all people are encouraged to be teachers, but also why we go on meeting together with teachers to lead us.
No one who reads from a translation of the Bible is somehow less faithful for doing so than someone who reads from the original languages. The suggestion is preposterous! I want to say, “Thank God for our Bible translators!” But the fact that we need translators tells us just how important it is to have people who do know the original languages. Without them, people are missing out.
I’ve heard some ministers who took Hebrew at seminary say they no longer use it, see no ongoing value for it in their ministry, or in hindsight think that learning Hebrew was too much effort for too little return—that it was time they could have spent better studying other things. But that makes me wonder whether they’re continuing to give the Scriptures their all. The Scriptures are the basis of all theological endeavour. Not everyone has the opportunity to learn Hebrew or Greek, but knowing them allows the teacher to weigh up the decisions made by others about the meaning of Scripture—be they other Bible translators, theologians, other ministers, the leaders of their Bible study groups, the TV documentary host, or the person on the street. And this is an ongoing task that is never finished. While the Scriptures don’t change, the situations we find ourselves in do. And so we need to continue understanding and interpreting the Scriptures for these new situations. One of the mottos of the Reformation captures this need nicely: semper reformanda (‘always reforming’). If a teacher is not actively examining and weighing up the Scriptures against ever changing situations, relying instead on what others say or translate, then they have fallen into a false sense of security. They have actually begun to congeal in a tradition. Teachers should be capable of continual, close examination of the Scriptures. Knowing ‘Shalom’, ‘Hallelujah!’, and the meaning of ‘Yom Kippur’ doesn’t cut it.
“I can still have a fruitful ministry without the original languages,” you might say. True. But which doctor would you go to: the one who has a full waiting room, a soothing voice, and gives you a jellybean at the end of the consultation, or the one who has all the paraphernalia to diagnose you and write you a correct prescription?
For the sake of your future congregations and the God whose Scriptures you will authoritatively interpret for them, give the original languages your best shot and don’t give them up once you’ve graduated. That’s when you’ll use them the most! Knowing the original languages won’t guarantee you’ll be a better speaker, but it will mean you know the Scriptures better. By all means, polish up your speaking skills, but for God’s sake make sure you know what you’re talking about. Know it well! God demands much of his teachers, so you should demand much of yourself, too.
So if you’re heading to theological college and have the opportunity to study Hebrew and Greek, please have a very good reason for not doing so. “It’s not for everybody,” or “It’s not really necessary,” just aren’t really good enough for would-be teachers. Both God and his flock, whom you will shepherd, deserve your best efforts.
"
I put the whole post because I think it's a modest proposal to those who plan on being in the ministry. I have no plans for it, but I still can't get away from the siren call of Biblical studies. I've spent a few years in Greek, and will be heading toward Hebrew later this year, and I'm not joining the ministry. (I would be too unpleasant for so many reasons.) So, it should be more pertinent to those who are going to join the ministry to study the languages. 
-Steven C. 

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Quote of the Day

Today's Quote is from Jim West.
"

The Idol This Age Adores…

by Jim
The god whose altar this age worships at is called 'license' but it also goes by 'freedom'.  Greater idols have yet to be seen.
Even Christians have, in large numbers, come to this false god's altar and bowed to it with the massa perditionis. 
They need to be reminded of something:  there is one God, and his name is not 'freedom'." 
Amen. 

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

The Virtue of Wealth

   Recently, I've had been in discussions about wealth. Of course, as a Christian, we can easily be tempted to view it as a vice, or a virtue. Some might say, "Well, someone has to finance the work of God." And, to that, I'd reply, "Yes, and it's God."...silently, or in my mind, I'd end with, "...,half-wit". Still, I see Christians more and more obsessed with becoming wealthy, or just working hard to have nice things. A new car, a new home, nice clothes, and nicely groomed kids to show how sinners could become! Of course, this is because, as Jesus was whipping money changers out of the temple, or not having a place to lay his head, he was offering those downtrodden, abused and hungry to "come, follow me, and I'll make you look like the middle-class, or even an aristocrat!" A strange thing to say coming from a first century peasant, but I'm sure Bill O'reilly could clarify this with his book (which I'll never read).
   For many years, I had thought that my dad was a bit of a loser (of course, I had admired him on so many other levels, but his lack of business sense was a bit embarrassing) when I was younger. He had a decent job, and we lived in a suburb, but we didn't have the extra nice things. My clothes weren't from Macys till my late teen years, and usually from money I earned from my job. I had equated my dad's worth with his income. Ironically, I thought he didn't put enough effort into building wealth. "He must've been lazy!" I thought. Still, he had worked absurd amounts of hours. There were times when he had worked three jobs! It didn't add up. To me, growing up thinking that wealth equated to hard work, I saw a contradiction when I saw my dad. He was hardworking, intelligent, and passionate, but he was also broke. It was until recently that I noticed what was the flaw in my thinking: I had understood wealth to become a means to determine virtue.
    We romanticize it. With our pricey lawyers, we can do no wrong! Of course, this is best displayed with the handsome Mr. Grey. He is wealthy, attractive, and perverse! His two virtues excuse him from his perversion; as a matter of fact, it makes him more desirable. Recently, I've read that there were a lot of purchases for the Fifty Shades of Grey movie in the South, the "Bible belt". Some have speculated that this is a result from the oppressive tendencies of Southern culture, and it could be, but I propose that the behavior of eroticism is excused if that person is covered under the blood of wealth. God's blessings are to those who work hard. I keep on hearing that if one is to work hard, then one will receive wealth. Hard work will translate to large sums of money-it's a fact, Jack! Then, we can see the virtue that the rich have. They are overly wealthy, and that justifies their actions; nay, it romanticizes it. Though it seems as though it's a stretch to connect wealth as a virtue to Fifty Shades' acceptance, I find that this meme is appropriate (probably better than this post):


Saturday, March 7, 2015

The Lost Gospel Review

I haven't read the book, and I don't believe I ever will. Not because I refuse to look at an opposing view, but because it seems like a waste of time. As a working-student, I can't afford the time to devote my self to works like this. If I am to read a work, it's to be for my intellectual development, or because I will be genuinely entertained; this book seems to offer neither of those. Hence, I refuse to read it; however, I don't mind reading great reviews of the book! So, here's one from Anthony LeDonne, originally via the Jesus Blog.

"THE LOST GOSPEL is not the worst book ever written. I once attended a party where I was subjected to an excerpt of dinosaur erotica. It was a lovely gathering otherwise, but my ears were assaulted by pages from Taken by the T-Rex. I will say no more for fear that I will corrupt you, gentle reader. The silver lining of my turpid tale is that I now have a new barometer for beastly books. While The Lost Gospel is no match for dinosaur erotica, it is equally daring. ...." 
Here's the link for the rest of it! http://lareviewofbooks.org/review/gronking-jesus/

Friday, March 6, 2015

Violence and the Western Taste


I can't help but be annoyed at our American worship of sports. It's a shame that we, as Americans, celebrate violence, in the name of entertainment, e.g., full contact sports like boxing, or mma. I wonder if we'd consider violence romantic if we lived in Syria, or other countries were violence isn't a spectacle, but a reality. I can see that the spectacle of people beating each other for money could be exciting, but so are so many wrongs. The sadist finds thrills in perversion, and that doesn't justify his actions. Sometimes, I feel that our fascination with violence is part of our gluttonous tendencies. Could a people who have been beaten, raped, harmed or have lost their children to an oppressive hand, find entertainment in the submission of competitors by affliction of pain? I suspect that they won't. I believe that our disassociation with the real cruelties that happen in the world leave us unrealistically hungry to see someone in pain. This, I suspect, is a result of the superfluities of our modern western securities.
-Steven C.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Amen!

                
John 1:3-4
      3 πάντα  δι’  αὐτοῦ  ἐγένετο,  καὶ  χωρὶς  αὐτοῦ  ἐγένετο  οὐδὲ  ἕν    γέγονεν.  
ἐν  αὐτῷ ζωὴ  ἦν,  καὶ    ζωὴ  ἦν  τὸ  φῶς  τῶν  ἀνθρώπων.
3. Through him, all things were made, and without him, not a thing came into being.
4. In him was life, and the life was the light of men. 
"...for if there is to be talk of God in a sense meaningful to men, there must also be at this point talk of the world, as the sphere in which men find themselves." 
-Rudolf Bultmann 
QUOTE OF THE WEEK 
(Translation by yours truly) 

Thursday, February 12, 2015

New Atheism and Its Entailments

Some of you may know, or have suspected, that I am not an atheist.  I am a Christian. As a Christian, I have struggled with notions, and questions of God, justice, and other similar things. As a student, I have also been challenged regarding interpretations of Christian texts that I have just assumed to be correct. Imperialistic, and capitalistic readings have been central to my understanding of the Bible for most of my life; that, however, has changed. Oddly enough, there are imperial interpretations of religious phenomena with the "New Atheist". The article below is brilliant. It seems as though the left is removing itself from new atheism, and is taking a more central approach to religion. The author really puts the American terrorist from North Carolina into context. It seems as though violence is only justifiable with fundamentalism, both religious and secular. Give it a read!!!


https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/12/new-atheism-old-empire/

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

My Prayer Borrowed from Luke

  Θεός,  εὐχαριστῶ  σοι  ὅτι  οὐκ  εἰμὶ  ὥσπερ  οἱ  λοιποὶ  τῶν  ἀνθρώπων,  ἅρπαγες,  ἄδικοι,  μοιχοί,   καὶ  ὡς  οὗτος    τελώνης·  12 νηστεύω  δὶς  τοῦ  σαββάτου,  ἀποδεκατῶ*  πάντα  ὅσα  κτῶμαι.
"God, I thank you, for I am not as the other men, swindlers, unrighteous, adulterers, or even as this tax collector; I fast twice a week, I tithe all things, as much as I get."
Amen.
A quick translation, and short prayer to inspire my reader(s).

Thursday, February 5, 2015

Tax Breaks for the Rich

GOP tax breaks will benefit the likes of Conrad Hilton. This degenerate has spoken volumes about the (watch-out! Here it comes!) income inequality from which this county suffers. Read the Washington Post article, and think of the disconnect he has with most of society. Of course, not all rich are like this, but entitlement isn't for the "lazy" that "live it large" off of welfare, or those "benefit-grabbing illegals"; it's a disease that makes all levels of society reek of rotting insatiable flesh.